A new USGS report evaluates how well the national streamgage network meets needs for streamflow information by assessing its ability to produce various streamflow stats at locations that have streamgages (gaged) and those that do not (ungaged).

The report analyzes where there are gaps in the network of gaged locations, how accurately useful statistics can be calculated with a given length of record, and whether the current network allows for estimation of these statistics at ungaged locations.  The results of the report indicate that there is variability across the nation’s streamflow data-collection network in terms of the spatial and temporal coverage of streamgages.

In general, the eastern US has better coverage than the western US, and the arid southwestern US, Alaska, and Hawaii were observed to have the poorest spatial coverage, using the dataset assembled for this study.  With the exception of Hawaii, these areas also tended to have short streamflow records.

Differences in hydrology lead to differences in the uncertainty of statistics calculated in different regions of the country.  Arid and semiarid areas of the central and southwestern U.S. generally exhibited the highest levels of inter-annual variability in flow, leading to larger uncertainty in flow statistics at both gaged and ungaged locations.

At ungaged locations, information can be transferred from nearby streamgages if there is sufficient similarity between the gaged watersheds and the ungaged watersheds of interest.  Areas where streamgages exhibit high correlation with other streamgages are most likely to be suitable for this type of information transfer.  The areas with the most highly correlated streamgages appear to coincide with mountainous areas of the US; lower correlations are found in the central U.S. and coastal areas of the southeastern US.

This is vital: -Learn More A national streamflow network gap analysis